Halo 3 launches, becomes fastest-selling videogame ever

TOPH TUCKER '08

Since Halo 3 was launched on September 25, Bungie.net reports that the “UNSC Kill Count”—the collective kill count for all Halo 3 players—stands at around 3 billion enemies. Glorification of mass murder aside (don’t worry, they’re only aliens and parasites), it’s an impressive number. But it’s just the tip of a statistically stunning iceberg: 3.6 million hours of gameplay on the first day; 40 million in the first week; 2.7 million gamers.

More significantly for Bungie and Microsoft (the creators of Halo), the game’s day-one sales totaled more than $170 million dollars. That makes it the biggest day in entertainment history, surpassing such juggernauts as Spider-Man 3 and the final Harry Potter book. By the end of the week, the two companies had pulled in $300 million. Halo 3 is being counted on to turn Microsoft’s entertainment division profitable, and in September the 360 sold 26,000 more units than any other videogame system. Despite being released near the end of the month, Halo 3 sold twice as many copies as the next nine most popular games of September combined.

The Halo Story

The Halo trilogy, exclusive to Microsoft’s Xbox videogame console, tells the story of a superhuman soldier of the future called the Master Chief. The first Halo game launched with the original Xbox in November 2001, followed by the second installment in November 2004. The original was a “system seller,” and instantly catapulted the Xbox into the videogame big-leagues. Halo 2, meanwhile, was a defining moment in the history of Xbox Live, Microsoft’s online subscription service. It pioneered features like voice, text messaging, and player profiles that would later be incorporated into the Xbox 360.

Halo 3 adds many features, most of them again centered around Xbox Live. The story mode can now be played through with up to three other players online, and multiplayer has received various tweaks and upgrades. In addition, players can create their own maps, game variants, screen shots, and even films to share with others.

Not everyone is a fan of the series. The Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee calls Halo 3 “[t]he ‘Third Wave’ of Destroying the U.S.” It proclaims, “The vicious attack on the human mind by this cybernetics cult has been one of the key tricks by the oligarchy, that has arrested the development of the youth, today, preventing any consistent intellectual and political motion to change the world.” Sergeant Johnson could not be reached for comment.

Bungie again independent

Bungie, developer of the series, was bought by Microsoft in 2000. The launch of Halo 3, though, was followed up on October 5 by the news that Bungie is once again an independent developer. Microsoft retains a minority stake, publishing agreements, and the rights to the Halo franchise. The deal gives Bungie renewed freedom to “achieve its real goal of total world domination,” as the press release states. At the same time, Microsoft keeps one of its most valuable partners happy. The headline on the internet news site Fark.com read, “Bungie unassimilated.”

Founder Jason Jones sums it up like this:

“Working with Microsoft was great for us, it allowed us to grow as a team and make the ambitious, blockbuster games we all wanted to work on. And they will continue to be a great partner. But Bungie is like a shark. We have to keep moving to survive. We have to continually test ourselves, or we might as well be dolphins. Or manatees.”

Further reading:
Bungie.net
Bungie.net: Bungie branches off
Joystiq: Bungie branches off
Major Nelson: Halo 3 Posts
Xbox 360 Fanboy: Halo 3 Posts
Xbox 360 Fanboy: NPD September Results
Joystiq: Pachter says 360 will beat Wii in September
Joystiq: "Morning Crazy Pill"
LaRouche PAC: Third Wave of Destroying the U.S.

Top image: Vivek Pai, '08, takes out Toph Tucker '08 with a lucky rocket.

Bottom image: In the "Infection" multiplayer game mode, humans often end up forming large roving convoys.

Read more!

President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks at Columbia; mixed reaction in U.S. and Iran

TAYLOR HAIGLER '08

“Hate-mongering vitriol,” “Hitler of Iran” and “Madman Iran Prez” are just a few of the names that have appeared in the news lately referring to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the President of Iran. He has become one of the most troublesome and noteworthy leaders in the world. Last year, Time magazine described him as “a president unlike any other Iran has known: belligerent, naïve…and a dark genius at mobilizing Iranian public opinion.”

Throughout his political career, Ahmadinejad has been widely criticized for his anti-semitic remarks, having previously referred to the Holocaust as a myth and called for the destruction of Israel. He speaks critically of the United States government, calling it an “arrogant power” that has no right to try and limit Iran’s industrial and technological development. Ahmadinejad has continued Iran’s uranium-enrichment program despite countless demands from the United Nations Security Council to stop developing nuclear capabilities. Ahmadinejad has also become increasingly unpopular at home for spending too much time criticizing the West and not enough time reforming the nation’s stagnant economy.

Recently, Ahmadinejad has been under severe scrutiny because of the controversy surrounding his last trip to the United States. The Iranian President came to New York City to speak at the United Nations General Assembly and was invited to address the students at Columbia University as part of the school’s World Leaders series.

In response, the nation erupted in protest over Ahmadinejad’s invitation to speak. Given the inflammatory nature of his position on Israel, the West and his support of terrorist activities, many were incensed that Columbia would give Ahmadinejad a forum to express his views. Christine Quinn, speaker of the New York City Council said, “All he will do on that stage is spew more hatred and more venom out there to the world.” Others supported Columbia’s decision of allowing Ahmadinejad to speak insisting that institutions of higher learning must value academic freedom and have an obligation to share differing opinions.

Despite the vociferous opposition, Ahmadinejad addressed an auditorium of students and faculty on September 18th. In his introduction, Columbia President, Lee Bollinger, addressed the concerns that the protesters put forth and reiterated that Columbia in no way supports Ahmadinejad’s actions or beliefs. Bollinger spoke of Ahmadinejad’s alleged support of Iraqi insurgents targeting U.S. troops, his government’s nuclear ambitions and his remarks about Israel. He concluded his introduction with, “And today I feel all the weight of the modern civilized world yearning to express the revulsion at what you stand for. I only wish I could do better.” American rhetoric ironically runs the risk of solidifying Ahmadinejad’s shaky support at home. Many considered Bollinger’s introduction patronizing and inhospitable as he referred to Ahmadinejad as a “petty and cruel dictator.” Ahmadinejad responded, “In Iran, tradition requires when you invite a person to be a speaker, we actually respect our students enough to allow them to make their own judgment, and don’t think it’s necessary before the speech is even given to come in with a series of complaints to provide vaccination to the students and faculty.” In this exchange he came off as the victim, getting the better of Bollinger.

Throughout the question and answer session, Ahmadinejad carefully dodged the answers to many pointed questions that the students had submitted. However, when the moderator asked why Iran executed gays, he declared, “In Iran, we don't have homosexuals, like in your country. We don't have that in our country. In Iran, we do not have this phenomenon. I don't know who's told you that we have it.” His refusal to directly answer any of the other questions that students posed made a sham of what could have been a truly intellectual debate.

Image from:
http://www.iranchamber.com/history/mahmadinejad/images/mahmoud_ahmadinejad1.jpg

Read more!

American mercenary group's killings spark outrage in Iraq

TOPH TUCKER '08

On September 16, at least 11 Iraqis were killed, not by terrorists, not by Iraqi security, not by the American military, but by Blackwater USA—a private security company used to protect State Department officials and other diplomats abroad.

The story, according to reports, goes something like this: a Blackwater Private Security Detail was escorting a State Department convoy to a meeting. Somewhere around Nasoor Square in Baghdad, Blackwater may or may not have opened fire on a slow-moving car that failed to get out of the way. An explosive device or mortar may or may not have exploded near the convoy. The vehicles may or may not have been attacked with small-arms fire. As the situation escalated, a Blackwater helicopter may or may not have opened fire from the air.

While Blackwater claims they weren’t attacking civilians, evidence states otherwise. Outrage followed the incident, and Iraqi officials attempted to ban Blackwater from the country, but relented in the face of US pressure. (Since Paul Bremer passed “Order 17” on June 27, 2004, Blackwater and other American-associated forces have been immune from Iraqi law, but the policy is now under scrutiny.) The Blackwater probe has since expanded to five incidents in which the firm allegedly killed Iraqi civilians.

Many officials are accusing Blackwater guards of tending to overreact. Iraqis, certainly, have long resented their presence. Just this weekend, the State Department announced new restrictions that will try to curtail this sort of incident. The State Department, though, may not have the resources to fully protect itself without hiring contractors like Blackwater. Nevertheless, the latest word is that use of private security contractors may soon be phased out.

The news from Iraq isn’t all bad, however. The AP reports that American and civilian deaths last month hit their lowest point in over a year, the latest indication that June’s surge may actually be working. This most recent Blackwater incident, though, just makes it clearer than ever that the situation in Iraq is far from reaching any sort of resolution.

Image from:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/42487

Further Reading:

Blackwater probe expands to 5 deadly incidents
Blackwater USA
Death From All Sides
Deaths among U.S. forces, Iraqi civilians drop

Other News from Iraq:

United Kingdom to commence partial Iraq withdrawal
Al-Qaida confirms senior leader was killed in U.S. airstrike
New type of bomb is unexpectedly lethal in Iraq
Key Figures About Iraq

What do you think?
Does Blackwater belong in Iraq?
Read more!